PS5 Slim (EDM-140) – BLOD, RAM calibration / impedance error – diagnostics so far Error code: 80801510

PS5 Slim (EDM-140) powers on with beep + blue LED for ~2 seconds, then shuts off. No second beep.

PSU / basics
• PSU tested standalone: 12.15 V stable
• 12 V remains stable on motherboard during shutdown
• All fuses OK, HDMI visually fine
• Board fully cleaned, liquid metal removed, no visible corrosion

Voltages during power-on
• RAM VDD/VDDQ: ~1.37–1.38 V
• APU core: ~0.90–0.91 V
• Rails appear briefly, then drop when console shuts off

UART 80801510 – RAM calibration / impedance fault on Chip 5

After a light reflow of chip 5 it briefly reported 80801F12 (RAM hardware fault), then reverted back to 80801510 consistently.

RAM work
• Chip 5 removed
• New same-model GDDR6 installed, same error (UART 80801510 – RAM calibration / impedance fault on Chip 5)
• Multiple reflows performed
• Original chip reinstalled for comparison, same error (UART 80801510 – RAM calibration / impedance fault on Chip 5)

Same UART error with original RAM, new RAM, and reflowed RAM

Measurements
• RAM VDD/VDDQ → GND: ~23–26 Ω, equal across all banks
• Diode-mode checks show one shared RAM reference-type net with significantly lower readings, present even with the RAM chip removed. A shared RAM reference-type net (many pins on each RAM + many nearby MLCCs; “Net72” on PHAT boardviews) measures ~0.040 V in diode mode to GND across multiple points, while other nearby nets read ~0.24–0.37 V.
• Thermal camera: all RAM chips heat evenly during the short startup window

Status
• RAM IC itself does not appear to be the cause
• Power rails are present during startup
• Suspecting shared RAM reference / termination rail or passive component issue

Looking for input
• Best next steps on PS5 Slim RAM calibration faults
• Anyone seen 80801510 persist after confirmed-good RAM replacement
• Tips to isolate faulty passives on RAM reference / termination rails

I checked the VPP side already: the 1 µF caps on the opposite side of the DDR are present, in continuity, and diode/resistance readings are consistent across multiple RAM banks, including the failing one. No anomaly there.

Same for ZQ_A / ZQ_B: both 120 Ω to GND, identical diode readings compared to other banks. Traces and surrounding passives also measure the same bank-to-bank.

At this point it looks less like a discrete RAM / VPP / ZQ issue and more like the APU’s own impedance training failing internally. Reworking RAM and verifying the external reference networks didn’t change behavior.

Open to ideas, but I’m starting to suspect IMC/APU rather than the memory side.

No one alive here? :frowning: